[ris-int] Reply-To forwarded to /dev/null in myASn messages
Rene Wilhelm wilhelm at ripe.net
Wed Jul 14 15:09:28 CEST 2004
>> Shouldn't there be follow up by a risopsy when a notification >> fails to be delivered? (for permanent failures, either try > Quite unlikely, if I know that alarm notifications were successfully > sent to my inbox. Sorry, I don't understand your reply. If a mail from the myASn system bounces, someone should in my opinion take action. Either the user made a mistake, typo, entering the e-mail address in the myASn system, or he has left the ISP owning the ASn. risops could try to get in touch with the ASn owner, to get the email address corrrected (remember, we are running a _service_ ) or when that fails remove the address from the alarm system (no point polluting internal an external systems with e-mails you know will bounce back) Also, when the human recipients behind a remote e-mail change, they might reply, querying what the message was about; it's not polite to silently ignore such one-off replies. -- Rene > > We need to add risops to the trusted users class in sendmail.cf on > > weesp. Something like > > So myASn can use reply-to address forwarded to /dev/null > > > > Once Matthew Williams wrote: > > >Hi Alexis, > > > > > >Working on this? > > > > > >Cheers, > > >Matthew > > > > > >----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System > > ><MAILER-DAEMON at ripe.net> ----- > > > > > >X-Recipient: <risops at ripe.net> > > >Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:43:50 +0200 (CEST) > > >From: MAILER-DAEMON at ripe.net (Mail Delivery System) > > >Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender > > >To: risops at ripe.net
[ Ris-int Archives ]