<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/xhtml; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body><div style="font-family: sans-serif;"><div class="markdown" style="white-space: normal;">
<p dir="auto">Dear Colleagues,</p>
<p dir="auto">I am glad to declare RIPE community consensus on draft v2 [<a href="https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-documents/other-documents/ripe-ncc-staff-participation-in-the-ripe-community-draft-v2" style="color: #3983C4;">1</a>] of the<br>
document on RIPE NCC staff participation in RIPE.</p>
<p dir="auto">I expect that the text of this draft will be published as a RIPE<br>
document in the near future, after final editing to add<br>
acknowledgements, check spelling and terminology, and make whatever<br>
other minor changes may be needed to prepare it for release.</p>
<p dir="auto">I should like to add a few remarks.</p>
<p dir="auto">Last call on this draft was re-opened on 21 July 2023 [<a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2023-July/002967.html" style="color: #3983C4;">2</a>], and closed<br>
on 4 September 2023.</p>
<p dir="auto">During this second last-call period, there were a number of expressions<br>
of support, and none of objection, to the two principles enunciated in<br>
this draft.</p>
<p dir="auto">In addition, on 2 August 2023, Andy Davidson maintained [<a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2023-August/002984.html" style="color: #3983C4;">3</a>],</p>
<blockquote style="margin: 0 0 5px; padding-left: 5px; border-left: 2px solid #777777; color: #777777;">
<p dir="auto">As a responsible community, it is incumbent upon us to safeguard NCC<br>
staff from potential conflicts of interest by defining clear<br>
protocols for how such situations are considered and managed when<br>
NCC staff participate in RIPE activities with activity plans,<br>
budgets, or hiring decisions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">He also asked,</p>
<blockquote style="margin: 0 0 5px; padding-left: 5px; border-left: 2px solid #777777; color: #777777;">
<p dir="auto">Can this be captured in the lovely<br>
succinct way that you have approached the first two drafts?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">At the time, I replied that I hoped so.</p>
<p dir="auto">On reflection, I believe that the initiative for addressing Andy's<br>
concerns is best left to RIPE NCC management and staff.</p>
<p dir="auto">Pragmatically, they have well-established internal mechanisms which<br>
would likely not run more smoothly if the community were to try to<br>
orchestrate them. Diplomatically, the community should avoid<br>
telling NCC management and staff what is good for them.</p>
<p dir="auto">Moreover, I have been made aware that the RIPE NCC is planning to<br>
review its internal guidelines on staff interaction with the<br>
community, and needs to know the consensus of the community in order<br>
to inform that review.</p>
<p dir="auto">For all these reasons, I believe it is appropriate to declare<br>
consensus on this document now, rather than to attempt improving it<br>
further.</p>
<p dir="auto">Finally, I wish to thank everyone who has participated in discussing<br>
this draft and its predecessor.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,</p>
<p dir="auto">Niall O'Reilly<br>
RIPE Vice-Chair</p>
<hr style="border: 0; height: 1px; background: #333; background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #ccc, #333, #ccc);">
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>