This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Fwd: Sanctions and the Internet report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu May 11 16:01:40 CEST 2023
On 11/05/2023 14:51, Joe Abley wrote: > Following on from my previous comment, I think it would be better to > focus on avoiding *actual* conflicts of interest. I think worrying > about appearances is what happens when there is a lack of understanding > of the substance and, in the case of managing a useful and > productive collaboration between the community and > NCC-as-secretariat,the substance seems important. > > If the goal is to avoid a need for understanding, then it seems like the > natural solution is that NCC staff should never be allowed to > participate as members of the community at all. I don't think that is > necessary or desirable. If we had a perfect world then I'd agree with you. However I've been in this business long enough to know that if there is a faintest chance of a possible thought of a conflict then someone will complain. However, I'm not part of this community any longer in any real sense, and if people think this isn't important then go for it. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Fwd: Sanctions and the Internet report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]