[ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion

Peace,

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:23 PM Lu Heng <h.lu at larus.net> wrote:
> Hi Toma:
>
> "The requestors didn't know about these nuances of the Mauritian legislation."
>
> Hans have confirm the request was reviewed [..skipping the rest - TG..]

All of this is entirely irrelevant to the simple fact that the RIRs
(as you stated) can not request an UN "specialized agency" status from
the Mauritian government, the Serbian government, the barista at
Metropol, me, or any other unrelated party.  The official UN status
could only be granted by the UN, and therefore could only be requested
from the UN office.

There were no such requests I'm aware of to the UN office from any of
the RIRs.  You're welcome to present a proof of such a request, with
strictly *the UN office* being the addressee, should you have one.

Unless you have it (which is unlikely), the topic seems closed to me
because your original claim is addressed.  With whatever unrelated
complaints you have about the operations of the NCC legislation
office, please spawn a separate thread and not change subjects in an
e-mail conversation.  This is pretty much e-mail etiquette respected
and followed for 30+ years.

--
Töma