This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] LIR and Member Agreements
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE 85 is taking place next week!
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondřej Filip
exec-board-announce at ripe.net
Fri Oct 21 15:09:40 CEST 2022
Dear colleagues, Earlier this year, Denis Walker (RIPE Database Working Group co-Chair) emailed with a list of comments and suggestions to improve our legal framework and documentation, and specifically the SSA and LIR Account Agreement. First off, we would like to thank Denis for taking the time and effort to review all of this and for sending his suggestions for improvement and clarity. The Legal Department at the RIPE NCC has devoted quite some time to looking at all the comments and checking whether we need to make changes based on them. Some of the comments they found should not lead to changes in the text as there are valid legal reasons to keep it as is or there are no legal reasons to amend the text. The areas where we agree we need to make changes are listed below: - Correct a number of typos as suggested - Clarify the applicability of the arbitration procedure in conflicts arising from the LIR Account Agreement - Review the needs-based criterion mentioned in the procedural document about Closure of Members and Deregistration of Resources - Align the wording on our webpages regarding the term “service fee- annual contribution” The RIPE NCC can start to implement some of these changes quite soon. For amendments concerning the SSA, they will need to make changes that require the approval of the RIPE NCC General Meeting. They plan to make the proposed amendments ahead of the GM in May 2023 and request that the members approve the changes to the relevant documents there. It is also clear that the distinction between LIRs and RIPE NCC members is one that causes confusion, and we believe this is an area where both the membership and community should discuss how best to ensure there is clarity in this area. In the legal documentation, it refers to RIPE NCC members that may have one or more LIR accounts. The RIPE NCC will continue to make improvements based on both the legal and policy requirements that we work under. Again, we very much appreciate this input and think it will lead to greater clarity for everyone. Best regards, Ondřej Filip RIPE NCC Executive Board Chair [1] https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2022-January/002418.html On 01/02/2022 15:20, Christian Kaufmann wrote: > Dear Denis, > Dear Fellow Members, > Dear all, > > First of all thanks a lot to Denis for all his work, I imagine it must > have taken hours. > We, the board and the NCC will follow up on it and will not just have a > look at the content itself but also look into how did we end up in this > situation in the first place. > We will come back to the mailing list after the legal evaluation is > conducted and also report on this at the next RIPE Meeting. > > Regarding the CoC aspect of this emails, we the board did not read Hans > Petters comments as shutting down the conversation or policing anyone > and we would not have allowed that. > > Best regards and please keep a respectful discussion in this challenging > times. > > Christian Kaufmann > Chairman of the NCC Executive Board > > > >> On 31. Jan 2022, at 20:58, Hans Petter Holen <hph at ripe.net >> <mailto:hph at ripe.net>> wrote: >> >> Dennis, >> Since you are a working group chair I am making this response in public. >> >> Thank you very much for your feedback on the LIR and Member Agreements. >> >> I do welcome constructive feedback and suggestions for improvements. >> >> I will not comment on your email right now, now but I will, however, >> point you to the RIPE Code of Conduct. >> >> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-766 >> <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-766> >> >> I read your characterisations of the document, as >> "This is probably one of the worst» >> >> as well as numerous others characterisations I will refrain from >> quoting, though out the document as completely unnecessary. >> >> They are not helping everyone to feel safe and included. >> >> Your choice of language does in my opinion, not adhere to the >> following principles from the Code of Conduct: >> >> • Being considerate and showing empathy towards others, especially >> when disagreeing or raising issues >> • Giving/receiving feedback or suggestions in a positive way. >> • Using welcoming and inclusive language >> >> I would like to encourage a healthy discussion for improving the >> document, but you make it very difficult for me to do so, and I >> sincerely hope the tone of the discussion can be constructive. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Hans Petter Holen >> Managing Director >> RIPE NCC >> >> >> >> >> <signature.asc> > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE 85 is taking place next week!
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]