This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] LAST CALL EXTENDED to 18 Feb: Draft Document: RIPE Task Forces - Definition and Guidelines
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sun Feb 20 14:46:21 CET 2022
Hi David, I know very well what is consensus: Been contributing in IETF and all the RIRs since 20+ years ago. Of course, you're free to think this way if I'm able to be constructive or not. However, facts from 20 years and around 100 or policy proposals among all the RIRs, which reached consensus, show otherwise. I've proven many times that I'm able to support and even defend objectively ideas/proposals that are against my personal subjective view point. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 20/2/22 14:29, "ripe-list en nombre de David Lamparter" <ripe-list-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de equinox at diac24.net> escribió: On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:01:49PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote: > You can't declare consensus in something that was developed by a TF > that discriminated even a single participant from being part of the > TF. Consensus is not unanimity. And task forces or workgroups have no inherent need to include everyone. In fact, consensus decision-making tries to cope with social situations where a few participants are unable or unwilling to learn, understand and adhere to established (by consensus) social interaction parameters. Since I have no relevant standing and no reputational damage to fear, I will just go and opine that you, JORDI, fall into that category. It is my impression that you might be unable to participate in a constructive manner. I am regretfully not skilled in how to express this in a way that may help you more to address this. If I were, I certainly would. I would also like to point out that the tolerance you've enjoyed hitherto can have negative impact and costs in alienating others from participating in this forum. I do not have the necessary insight to make that determination but am painfully aware and afraid of the possibility. -David (I have said my piece and will not be reading or responding in any manner on this matter, neither on-list nor on any other channel. I'm pretty close to being alienated-out myself here.) -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] LAST CALL EXTENDED to 18 Feb: Draft Document: RIPE Task Forces - Definition and Guidelines
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]