This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] protein over pablum
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] protein over pablum
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE 82 Highlights Day 5 and Thank you!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mirjam Kuehne
mir at zu-hause.nl
Tue May 25 11:34:55 CEST 2021
Dear Randy, I think Leo has already responded to most of your points. I just want to let you know that I am listening and that I am taking this seriously (we definitely don't want people to feel uncomfortable to bring up content). You are right that this is a bit of process-heavy time (with two task forces, updating the PDP and other documentation). But don't worry this won’t last forever. Kind regards, Mirjam On 21/05/2021 19:20, Randy Bush wrote: > < rant > > > [ trying to clarify what i meant at the mic; but probably just digging > a deeper hole ] > > i would not be up at 2am if i did not care about the CoC, DB, ... like > you, i think these things are important. and the folk working on them > are really good and nice and also care a lot (but i am already married). > and they are working hard and really trying and usually succeeding in > getting stuff done. > > so please tell us about it! the content, not the form/process. yes, i > could join your mailing list, read your documents (i often do), ... but > i have a life and two full-time jobs, and come to the plenary, WG, or > whatever at 2am to get a high content summary. > > i stay up to 3am for content, not form. we are becoming humorless and > fear based. i am thinking of making a generic Task Force Report slide > deck, where it shows X meetings, Y consultations, Z surveys, and thanks > for NCC support. you just put the TF's name at the top, plug in X, Y, > and Z, and it's done! > > because i *care* about the subject, i *really* want to learn of the > interesting issues that were found and how they were resolved. what > issues remain? what did the TF learn that was unexpected? protein, not > process. i trust you for the process, and really doubt you can make it > interesting to me at 2am. > > yes, 42 engineers will have opinions on these; and half those opinions > will be um, questionable. and some, such as this one, will be presented > a bit roughly. sorry. welcome to a world filled with us funny monkeys. > you did want input. and you get the big bucks for filtering and using > it. > > but talk is cheap. how can i help TF folk to feel comfortable enough to > put your content out? > > i just heard a svp of a massive net company ask their team and peers > "what would you do if you were not afraid?" > > randy > > --- > randy at psg.com > `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com` > signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] protein over pablum
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE 82 Highlights Day 5 and Thank you!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]