This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas Mckay
fearghas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 21:54:04 CEST 2021
Leo et al > On 29 Mar 2021, at 04:30, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > Also, some people have commented but not stated if they support the daft as is, or would support the draft with a minor change. I've placed a question mark next to names where I'm not sure what a person's position is. It would be great if you could clarify your position. I support the CoC in principle with the clarification that the complainer has to control any moves to expand the process, either internally or externally. Moving it to a guide to what you can and should do from "what you must not do" is a positive move. Explain the benefits of being a good citizen of our community. f
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]