This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] New on RIPE Labs: RIPE Chair Team Report - January 2021
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Fri Feb 12 00:44:10 CET 2021
Hi, > I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the > seat really was vacant. Unfortunately I know of at least two instances where that has happened in the past few years, after repeated calls for volunteers when the in-situ chair was stepping down, or had not decided whether they would re-stand. One of those instances led to me becoming NCC-Services co-chair after I'd done my time in Routing. :) It varies between working groups too, I can also recall a couple of different working groups that have had multiple volunteers recently and then wondered how to select the best candidate. Several WGs have tried to encourage a composition of two old hands and one new to the scene, but it hasn't always been successful (that's not to say we shouldn't keep on trying). I think it's fair to say that most, if not all, existing WG chairs and co-chairs would welcome some new volunteers and indeed advice on how to encourage people to stand, but the fame and glory may occasionally be over-stated. Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] New on RIPE Labs: RIPE Chair Team Report - January 2021
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]