[ripe-list] a proposal to change the PDP

    The proposal is fundamentally flawed because it shows a very poor understanding of how the PDP works. If/when a consensus judgement gets appealed to the WG Co-chairs Collective, anyone on the WGCC who was involved in that earlier judgement recuses themselves from the appeal. This is common sense and doesn’t need to be written down.

[Jordi] It has not been the case in the first appeal we had. Chairs that participated in the discussion, so voiced their opinion against the proposal discussion (and of course I agree they should do it), haven't recused themselves. Also, there are chances that "personal conflicts" happen and they don't recuse themselves, so at least there must be the chance to ask for recusing some of the chairs. Just look at legal systems. You can always, if you expose a reason, to ask for a judge recusation, and also when you appeal, it is a totally different set of judges from a totally different level. It is for perfect reasonable reasons.





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.