[ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"

Hi Andy,

I proposed several choices in my first versions (Arbiters, then Board), but the staff suggested against ... I understood some of the points of the disagreement by the staff, but I'm still open to have it again if the community believes is the right way.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 7/2/21 22:54, "ripe-list en nombre de Andy Davidson" <ripe-list-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de andy at nosignal.org> escribió:


    On 7 Feb 2021, at 13:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list <ripe-list at ripe.net> wrote:
    >  ("Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure”) 

    Hi, Jordi, all

    On your policy proposal: Is this something the Arbiters [0] could do well?

    Andy

    [0] http://ripe.net/about-us/legal/arbitration/list-of-arbiters



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.