[ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"

Hi Jordi,

Only responding to your proposal. I think this is a horrible idea.
Things are rarely, if ever, solved by inventing more layers of
bureaucracy. Creating an appeals committee is about the worst way to
deal with your unhappiness that the chairs don't agree with you.

The current policy already states that anybody who is involved in the
dispute has to recuse themselves, so there is no conflict of interest
to "fix".

Cheers,
Sander


PS: PLEASE don't invent your own proposal numbers. The RIPE NCC PDO is
the one who keeps track of proposal numbers. You can discuss things on
this list, but please stop giving your proposals self-invented numbers
to make them look more official.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210207/afdfc856/attachment.sig>