[ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:18:06PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> There is no question in my mind that the former category of information MUST
> be held in confidence by RIPE NCC.  The latter category, maybe not so much.

I agree that otherwise easily attainable information ("chamber of commerce")
does not need to be treated as "confidential".

OTOH, maybe it's just the easiest approach to things - "keep *any* document
submitted by the LIR as 'confidential'" - so there is no need for individual
NCC employees to decide on the nature of a document (especially given that
in RIPE land, something which might be "semi-public" in country A might
be not easily attainable in country B).

But I do not *know*, I'm just thinking out loud.

Gert Doering
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210825/83f9f83d/attachment.sig>