[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review

Hi all,

I should have made it clearer: I was responding to Niall's email.

@Randy: 100% agree

Cheers,
Gergana

On 21/04/2021 03:39, Randy Bush wrote:
> hi gergana,
> 
> [ top posting reversed ]
> 
>>> my naïve view is that, if the ncc is an organiser, then the coc MUST
>>> apply.
>>>
>>> if i am asked to be on (or chair) a panel which has no under-represented
>>> folk, i decline, making the reason very clear.
>>
>> I don't think of the SEE, MENOG and ENOG communities as "distinct from
>> RIPE", rather than sub-communities of RIPE.
> 
> i might phrase is as comminities *within* ripe; i.e. not subordinate to.
> but that is likely my over-sensitivity.
> 
>> These communities don't have a separate Chair or Working Groups and
>> their members participate in and are subject to the
>> RIPE-community-developed policies, which is why to me they are an
>> integral part of the RIPE community.
> 
> so are these communities then relevant?
> 
> my point was intended more to the ripe community or the ncc providing
> meeting coordination with an external group, e.g. Euro IoT Regulatory
> Wannabes.  imiho, the coc virus would be more beneficial than the gpl
> virus. :)  you hang out with us, you behave civily.
> 
> randy
> 
> ---
> randy at psg.com
> `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com`
> signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
>