[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review

hi gergana,

[ top posting reversed ]

>> my naïve view is that, if the ncc is an organiser, then the coc MUST
>> apply.
>> 
>> if i am asked to be on (or chair) a panel which has no under-represented
>> folk, i decline, making the reason very clear.
>
> I don't think of the SEE, MENOG and ENOG communities as "distinct from
> RIPE", rather than sub-communities of RIPE.

i might phrase is as comminities *within* ripe; i.e. not subordinate to.
but that is likely my over-sensitivity.

> These communities don't have a separate Chair or Working Groups and
> their members participate in and are subject to the
> RIPE-community-developed policies, which is why to me they are an
> integral part of the RIPE community.

so are these communities then relevant?

my point was intended more to the ripe community or the ncc providing
meeting coordination with an external group, e.g. Euro IoT Regulatory
Wannabes.  imiho, the coc virus would be more beneficial than the gpl
virus. :)  you hang out with us, you behave civily.

randy

---
randy at psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery