This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Apr 12 15:46:29 CEST 2021
> On 12 Apr 2021, at 14:16, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote: > > In the document, there is no mention of unwanted behaviour / attention that could be classified as stalking. IMO, that’s not a bug. It’s a feature. The CoC should just talk about inappropriate behaviour as a general concept and not attempt to enumerate every possible type of inappropriate behaviour. That way lies madness... The current draft has an illustrative (non-definitive) list of unacceptable behaviour and that should be good enough. BTW, the CoC should say “behaviour” not “behaviours”. According to the grammar police, behaviour is a mass noun -- like traffic, health, fairness, nonsense, etc -- and therefore doesn’t get pluralised.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]