This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue May 26 12:56:40 CEST 2020
> On 26 May 2020, at 09:49, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > >> Jim, you then go on to quote directly from RFC7282 which says very clearly that the concerns DO need to be addressed. > > Jim quoted it the wrong way around: concerns have to be addressed, but not accommodated. Correct. You all know what I meant anyway: we already have rough consensus for the status quo. Thanks Sander. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 528 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20200526/61f5d763/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]