This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Burkov
dvburk at gmail.com
Tue May 26 12:17:15 CEST 2020
I also want to repeat that it was email from Nomcom. Dima On 5/26/20 1:00 PM, Benno Overeinder wrote: > Hi Andy, all, > > Responding to Gert's answer that I fully endorse. > > On 26/05/2020 08:20, Gert Doering wrote: >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:59:48AM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote: >>> This is not consensus building. This is not suitable methodology from the Chair. This is disingenuous. >> The NomCom has been put in a very difficult situation here. > I agree with Gert. > > I would like to say that the NomCom Chair and the NomCom members > discussed the comments at length together and that the email was sent as > the NomCom, not as the NomCom Chair. > > Kind regards, > > Benno Overeinder > -- member of the NomCom > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]