[ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support

Hi,

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:59:48AM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote:
> This is not consensus building.  This is not suitable methodology from the Chair.  This is disingenuous. 

The NomCom has been put in a very difficult situation here.

We have a document that tells us what to do.  We do that.

In the middle of the road, concerns are voiced that the document is not
good enough - which might be a valid statement or not, but how should it
affect the current process, given the simultaneously expressed support for 
all the persons involved?


> I would ask those wishing to contribute to this thread to read the ripe-chair-discuss thread to familiarise themselves with the complaint.
> 
> The pool of talent in the RIPE community is sufficiently large
> enough to mean that the independence of the NCC and Community can
> be preserved through having different people contribute to the work
> of our committees, working-groups, and leadership teams; to say or
> to behave that this is not the case demonstrates contempt.

We do have a good set of very talented and widely recognized nominees.

Would it be good to have a wider selection?  Maybe.

Have all these other people of talent come forward and volunteered?  No.

What shall we do?

Gert Doering
        -- member of the NomCom.
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20200526/4e7c202d/attachment.sig>