This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] RIPE80 and COVID-19
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE80 and COVID-19
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE80 and COVID-19
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Mon Mar 2 23:37:22 CET 2020
Personally I would also like to know more and sooner. That does not make it so in a fluid situation such as this. To repeat my point: the channel is open! I am sure that as soon as there is something useful to say we will all hear about it here, including timetables etc. In the meantime let’s keep the noise down. Washing hands ... Daniel --- Sent from a handheld device. --- Sent from a handheld device. > On 2. Mar 2020, at 22:34, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2 Mar 2020, at 21:00, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote: >> >>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 19:39, Jim Reid wrote: >>> >>> … Current WHO advice is for meeting organisers to consult with the local public health authorities and carry >>> out a proper risk assessment. … >> >> Before this gets to be a huge thread: > > I see that ICANN-67 is now remote participation only. > >> I know first hand that the RIPE NCC and the RIPE Chair are in the process of updating the risk assessment for RIPE80 and evaluating options. > > Lucky you. But maybe the community could now also participate in the conversation? > >> As usual: should current plans change you will hear it here first. > > I would very much like that. So far all I have seen is a page on the web-site. On the list would have been better. > > So without going crazy, I would appreciate this channel being kept active. > >> Please return to more appropriate fora to discuss generalities. We can discuss again when/if alternatives to the current plan emerge. >> >> Daniel > > I accept it is too early to make firm GO / NO-GO decisions. But France has already banned gatherings of over 5000 people. And while we are nowhere near that we are a delightfully international community. So we present a higher risk? > > I think we need some indication, even a rough indication, of a possible decision timetable as soon as possible. Perhaps 35 days before? Unless the local authorities do something in the interim. People can then consider adjusting their own plans. > > And please wash your hands! > > Gordon > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE80 and COVID-19
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE80 and COVID-19
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]