This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] NomCom Volunteers and Selection
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] NomCom Volunteers and Selection
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] ASO Announces Support for Fundamental Bylaws Amendment to Article 18 of the ICANN Bylaws
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
farzaneh badii
farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Tue Dec 17 16:38:10 CET 2019
Daniel I am glad you found my brief suggestion useful and thanks so much for including it in the report. I understand the time constraints and am at your disposal if you want to do this kind of research in the future. It doesn't have to be too elaborate, we can use a brief survey or a couple of interviews as the first step. Farzaneh On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 3:21 PM Daniel Karrenberg <chair at ripe-nomcom.org> wrote: > Farzaneh, > > Welcome! Thank you for your thoughtful contribution. It is more than > appropriate and I appreciate it. With your permission I will include > your thoughts in the draft of the NomCom final report. The main purposes > of that report are to identify areas for improvement, to make > suggestions for changes and to serve as a guide for the next NomCom. > > As Randy suggested it would be excellent if serious research was done on > the questions you list. I intend to either perform or instigate some > research in this direction when I find the time and before the final > report is completed. Of course it would be better to do it sooner as > people’s memories tend to fade. Unfortunately I have no time to spare > for this right now. So, personally, I welcome initiatives in this > direction. > > Best > > Daniel > > PS: I have the impression that you misunderstood Randy’s directness as > lack of politeness or bad form. I interpreted it as a constructive > suggestion. We all have to be aware that such different interpretations > can happen in a community as divers as RIPE, however hard we try to > avoid them. > > Daniel > > > On 14 Dec 2019, at 16:58, farzaneh badii wrote: > > > Daniel, > > > > I think Sasha's point is important. You have a valid argument that few > > applied despite your outreach and effort. However, is it possible > > within > > the current procedures to find out the reasons they didn't apply? Did > > they > > get the communications? Do they not have enough resources and time to > > take > > part? Do they know and understand the importance of the role? And so > > on. > > If we can find out the reasons they didn't apply and if the issues > > they > > mention can be solved with some preparation (not impractical solutions > > though!), then you can prepare for the next Nomcom with additional > > insights. > > > > Just a thought. This is my first email to this list, I have no idea > > who has > > posting rights, so apologies if I am jumping in undeservedly. > > > > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20191217/a372d570/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] NomCom Volunteers and Selection
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] ASO Announces Support for Fundamental Bylaws Amendment to Article 18 of the ICANN Bylaws
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]