This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Jan 19 16:54:10 CET 2018
Eric, Jordi, I'm honestly not a fan, speaking of course purely for myself, of this proposal. Job, Jim and others have already covered a lot of the reasons why not. Yes, I'm fortunate that my company is willing to pay the meeting registration fee, but for a five day event I still think it's amazing value. I think it would unquestionably change the nature of the event and the perception of the WG Chairs (and PC) if the fees were to be waived. It wouldn't be some terrible disaster, but it would bring about a change, both in external and internal perception. It would be a slow change, sure, but it would be there. I have no objection to the NCC Membership funding the staff and the Exec Board or the various programmes such as RACI or the RIPE fellows. These are all very clear cut for me. But all of us who volunteer as WG Chairs or PC Members are just that, volunteers. We put our hand up knowing the requirements. One might hope that an incentive such as is being proposed wouldn't encourage people to step forward because of it, but I don't believe that is true. I would prefer if WGs continued to select (not elect!) the Chairs knowing, insofar as possible, that they wished to serve the community rather than having any other motivations. Again, I speak for myself here, not for any other member of the Chairs Collective or the PC. I'm sure there are members of both groups who might agree (and that is up to them, of course). With my member hat on, if we're going to spend more money on RIPE Meetings (and I believe they are some of the most important things the NCC spends money on!), then I can think of better things to spend it on than this, such as increasing the RIPE Fellowship Programme. Thanks, Brian Brian Nisbet Network Operations Manager HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 On 19/01/2018 15:34, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Just for info of the list, I've responded this morning in a private email something related to this (copying here only partially my own response). > > "... I also know that not every RIR has WGs, but they have equivalent structures (eg, Advisory Council for ARIN), and that sometimes the conferences are tied to other organizations, etc. At the end, all that doesn't really matter, because I'm not trying a one-to-one comparison, just providing references of "very-close-species". > > APNIC and LACNIC do that, even pay for traveling expenses. > > In LACNIC, this is true even for speakers that may obtain a grant for the traveling expenses, if they apply and it is justified. > > Somebody in the list could confirm for AfriNIC and ARIN, if we want to have the 5 RIRs picture, I know people there, so I'm happy to ask them directly if needed. > > Even if RIPE co-chairs could apply in a case-by-case basis for special waiver or grants, it is obvious that if you have a specific personal situation, you may not want/like to disclose it, and even worse, I think "special" rules are always bad things, very subjective and I prefer rules that are always objective and the same for same "groups" (like co-chairs or PC "group"), and I don't think that can be understood as a "segregation", because that group is elected by the community and everybody can make merits so he is considered by the community for being part of that group if he wants to invest the additional time/effort being part of that." > > > Regards, > Jordi > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: ripe-list <ripe-list-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen at me.com> > Responder a: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen at me.com> > Fecha: viernes, 19 de enero de 2018, 16:27 > Para: Lu Heng <h.lu at laruscloudservice.net> > CC: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>, RIPE List <ripe-list at ripe.net> > Asunto: Re: [ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers > > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Lu Heng wrote: > > > Hi > > > > APNIC since few meetings cover all expense for the chair(hotel flight etc), > > so free meeting ticket seems quite reasonable. > > > > CEO > > > > Larus Cloud Service Limited > > Tel: +852 2988-8918 <javascript:void(0);> > > E-mail: H.Lu at laruscloudservice.net > > Address: Flat B5, 11/F, TML Tower, No.3 Hoi Shing Road, Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong > > Website: https://www.laruscloudservice.net/ > > > > Lu, > > APNIC doesn't have WGs, they have SIGs, but I guess the SIGs are > "morale equivalents" in this context. > > Are you sure the SIG chairs at APNIC have all their expenses covered? > That's news to me. Perhaps you are referring to the APNIC EC chair? > > Ole > > > Ole J. Jacobsen > Editor and Publisher > The Internet Protocol Journal > Office: +1 415-550-9433 > Cell: +1 415-370-4628 > Docomo: +81 090 3337-9311 > E-mail: olejacobsen at me.com > Skype: organdemo > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.consulintel.es > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Follow up on the Dubai AGM - RIPE WG Chair meeting vouchers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]