This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] [comms] It's 2018, why are the RIPE hotels still using "booking forms"??
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [comms] It's 2018, why are the RIPE hotels still using "booking forms"??
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [comms] It's 2018, why are the RIPE hotels still using "booking forms"??
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Jan 12 18:06:07 CET 2018
On 12 Jan 2018, at 16:43, Denesh Bhabuta <dblists at icloud.com> wrote: > > Whilst I agree that we should be encouraging this, it is easier said than done to have the hotel companies apply this. > > ... explanation of meeting planner's hotel hassles snipped ... > > It is frustrating, but we are where we are. All we can do is try and encourage them to change… but in my experience over the last few years, that is not enough. I am unsure what else can be done. I wonder if it's worth talking to the IETF meeting organisers? IIUC they use a third party reservation service. {I forget its name.] On-line bookings "just work" with the meeting and overflow hotels. IETF meetings are larger and more frequent than RIPE meetings. So maybe that makes a difference.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [comms] It's 2018, why are the RIPE hotels still using "booking forms"??
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [comms] It's 2018, why are the RIPE hotels still using "booking forms"??
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]