Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE

At Thu, 8 May 2014 16:20:54 +0100,
Jim Reid wrote:
> 
> On 8 May 2014, at 15:46, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> > As "proposals" aren't people I am not sure whether the decision to change
> > the timeline sits with the proposer, the WG chair, or someone else.
> 
> Leo, like pretty much everything else in RIPE, this should be a
> consensus decision by the relevant WG(s). The WG chair should be
> responsible for making that happen.
> 
> I would have hoped it was not necessary to document this. IMO, RIPE
> needs to keep process and "rules" to the absolute minimum.

  As I read it, Leo's point is that, since the unfortunate phrase,
  "Individual proposals may choose ..." has to be corrected, we may
  as well choose the appropriate correction.

  ATB
  /Niall