This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Proposed Charter for OpenSource WG
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed Charter for OpenSource^WTools WG
- Next message (by thread): Proposed Charter for OpenSource WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Mon Oct 15 15:52:41 CEST 2012
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:11:39AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > A charter needs to be suitably vague to allow for flexibility. In the the charter also needs to be sufficiently clear to convey a general idea of overlap and distinction between the WGs, not the least because there is a finite amount of meeting slots. I'd generaly think that there ought to be a WG when there's enough (new) inetrest, but to me it is not yet clear what actual work/community building is to be done in that open source WG and Olaf's question re: DNS software, for one, is more than justified. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed Charter for OpenSource^WTools WG
- Next message (by thread): Proposed Charter for OpenSource WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]