This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu May 14 17:23:16 CEST 2020
Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote on 14/05/2020 15:22: > What Kurtis is pointing to is actually a change to the job > description, so definitely a change that might have affected > potential and current candidates. there were two things: a change to the job description and separately that it may be changing from an unpaid to a paid position. Both these things would have had an impact on who might have been interested in applying because most people cannot afford to take a half- or full-time position like this on an nnon-paid basis. If I read this correctly, both suggestions were made after the nominations pool was closed. This is concerning because potential candidates were implicitly excluded from applying due to changes made after the opportunity for applying was closed off. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]