This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed May 13 21:03:32 CEST 2020
Hi Randy, All, I honestly didn't like the criteria (attendance of 3 out of the last 5 meetings) to be eligible to be included in the draw of volunteers. Candidate qualifications, probably all four in the (short)list are fully qualified for the role(s). Preferences, of course, everyone has their own. :-) Regards, Carlos On Wed, 13 May 2020, Randy Bush wrote: > are folk who are 'commenting' here also talking with the nomcom, giving > their feedback about candidate qualifications and preferences? you > should be. > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]