This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed May 13 20:05:48 CEST 2020
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Jim Reid wrote: (...) > > You?ve also got to consider the practicalities. The most desirable candidates need to have several key attributes. IMO these include their standing in the community, a deep understanding of RIPE?s values and processes, an inexhaustible ability to cat-herd, diplomacy, patience, leadership, fairness, integrity, time/energy to do the job, etc, etc. There simply aren?t that many people around who have enough of these qualities. I think that goes a long way to explaining why the NomCom ended up with so few candidates to consider. Hi, I honestly prefer to believe there were more, but the other ones that don't show up on the (short)list, declined to be on the list. Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]