This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed May 13 18:47:30 CEST 2020
> On 13 May 2020, at 17:21, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > What makes me uncomfortable are the current and recent-past working relationships between the individuals involved - particularly that there are relationships of authority involved. These seem unlikely to influence the Nomcom’s deliberations. Or if they did, those involved would do the right thing. As you said yourself Nick, you have no doubts about both the good intentions and the good standing of all the individuals involved. I’m struggling to understand why you’re uncomfortable. Are there any relationships of authority here? AFAICT none of the candidates are (or were) the boss of anyone on the Nomcom. Or vice versa. Though that doesn’t mean there could be perceptions that those relationships exist.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]