This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Wed May 13 18:21:26 CEST 2020
Daniel Karrenberg wrote on 13/05/2020 08:01: > The nomination process is soundly executed. As you are aware the RIPE > Community has spent years to devise this process. The result is the most > formal process in RIPE to date. It is therefore important that we follow > it. Daniel, The procedures are not unreasonable, per-se. The individuals are fine too, for that matter - I have no doubts about both the good intentions and the good standing of all the individuals involved. What makes me uncomfortable are the current and recent-past working relationships between the individuals involved - particularly that there are relationships of authority involved. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]