This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Sat Mar 23 16:59:11 CET 2019
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:59:06PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote: Jim, All > The Selcom will recommend one candidate for RIPE Chairman and one > candidate for Vice-Chairman. The RIPE community will be asked to > endorse those recommendations. If there is no clear consensus for a > candidate, their recommendation will be withdrawn and the Selcom will > be responsible for choosing an alternative. This process of > recommendation and approval repeats until an acceptable candidate is > found. Just to clarify: since this could end up in the infinite loop, is the Pragmatism rule is going to be applied here? Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]