This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Mon Apr 1 12:30:05 CEST 2019
On 23/03/2019 18:07, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > ... I'm speaking out ;-) But, I'm in doubt here. As EB member I would like > to refrain from discussing this particular idea, but would like to > encourage the others to comment on in. ... Yes please. It would be encouraging to hear from more people. Daniel PS: Personally I strongly believe that anyone in the RIPE community should be able to speak up here. If some have roles that are relevant to the discussion they should just be open about them, like you are! I personally point out in every draft I am both one of the RIPE founders and now on the staff of the RIPE NCC. That should be sufficient to put my contributions into perspective. It would be a great loss to all of us if you kept quiet just because you have a role on the RIPE NCC EB. It is just important to note that like I do not speak for the RIPE NCC here, you do not speak for the EB, unless you do of course. ;-) Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]