This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Sun Oct 14 16:01:37 CEST 2018
On 14/10/2018 14:49, Nigel Titley wrote: > > > On 14/10/2018 14:35, Jim Reid wrote: >> >> Well it looks like we'll have consensus on the job description before we have that on the selection process. Creating a dependency between the two will add unwelcome complexity IMO. > Yep... >>> Is it appropriate to formalise the job of the vice chair at this time >>> (if we decide to have a vice chair)? >> How about this: >> >> The vice chair deputises for the chair as needed and deals with all the stuff that the RIPE chair doesn't want to do? > Well, suitably dressed up in Sunday clothes this sounds about right. There is precedent for exactly this. It worked. Daniel Former RIPE deputy chairman.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]