[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process

> On 14 Oct 2018, at 13:18, Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> wrote:
> 
> I like this, it isn't too formal and it's descriptive rather than
> prescriptive, which always seems to me to be the best way of proceeding
> in cases such as this.

+1

> Where i differ is in thinking that the process of selecting the RIPE
> Chair can pretty well be decoupled from the job description. However I'd
> not lose sleep if we decide to sort out the job description first.

Well it looks like we'll have consensus on the job description before we have that on the selection process. Creating a dependency between the two will add unwelcome complexity IMO.

> Is it appropriate to formalise the job of the vice chair at this time
> (if we decide to have a vice chair)?

How about this:

The vice chair deputises for the chair as needed and deals with all the stuff that the RIPE chair doesn't want to do?