[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process

I like that suggestion:)

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 15:24 Bijal Sanghani <bijal at euro-ix.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On 9 Oct 2018, at 17:02, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Would it work if we let PC appoint NomCom? There are probably problems
> >>> with this that I don't see.
> >> No. The same perceived problems arise with whatever group appoints the
> >> Nomcom.
> >
> > so don't *appoint* the nomcom at all.  random selection.  but i already
> > said that.
> >
>
> I think the problem with a random selection is just that, it’s random,
> would you really want someone who has never been involved with the RIPE
> community picking the potential next RIPE chair?
>
> I’m a bit late to this and apologies for that, but having read and agree
> with a lot of the discussion I would like to make a suggestion:
>
> The NomCom is selected randomly by whatever ‘name in the hat’ process,
> however to volunteer to be on the NomCom you must have been active in the
> RIPE community over the last x years by either attending y RIPE meetings or
> being active on a RIPE mailing list (or some defined criteria).
>
> The NomCom review and select the candidate who is presented to the
> community to endorse or reject.
>
> This keeps the process lightweight, open and removes the wgcc involvement,
> unless they want to put their name in the hat of course.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Bijal
>
> > randy
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20181011/4e23fef0/attachment.html>