This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Filiz Yilmaz
koalafil at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 16:27:35 CEST 2018
> On 9 Oct 2018, at 15:02, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > >> On 9 Oct 2018, at 11:12, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So practically RIPE Community will have the option of "objecting to a name" or "accepting the name". >> It is a very drastic measure to take compared to selecting names from a pool of candidates. > > True. But can you come up with something better? At least 3 people already made suggestions so far. See mails from me, Carlos and Malcolm namely. Filiz
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]