This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue Oct 9 12:25:44 CEST 2018
Jim, Somewhat off-topic, but I'd like to address it anyway. On 2018-10-09 12:02, Jim Reid wrote: > > And I’m also very uneasy about WGCC mission creep. [Personally speaking, I’d close down the WGCC completely. It rarely does anything useful and most of the time isn’t needed. Its role in the PDP could go away IMO.] Just to be clear, the only role that the Working Group Chairs Collective has in the current Policy Development Process is in the appeals procedure. The alternatives would be to ask some other group or person to handle appeals, to invent a new body to handle appeals, or to remove the possibility of appeals. I am comfortable with the current approach, although I might change my mind if anyone ever asked me to work on an appeal. 😉 Cheers, -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]