This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Filiz Yilmaz
koalafil at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 12:12:23 CEST 2018
No Jim, according to the process, WG Chairs Collective makes that decision and RIPE Community is left to endorse it, or not. The process reads: "The RIPE community will endorse the candidate put forward by the WG Chair collective." So practically RIPE Community will have the option of "objecting to a name" or "accepting the name". It is a very drastic measure to take compared to selecting names from a pool of candidates. Filiz On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > > On 9 Oct 2018, at 11:00, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have even more concerns that NOMCOM only hands-over a shortlist to the > WG Chairs Collective, who ultimately selects the Chair. > > Nope. The RIPE Community ultimately makes that decision. The WGCC should > select the best candidate from the shortlist. But the RIPE Community > decides if the WGCC made the right choice. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20181009/5e245c5f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]