This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Oct 9 01:09:28 CEST 2018
Jim Reid wrote on 08/10/2018 23:59: > There is*nothing* in the current proposal which says this. Now > perhaps that language isn't clear enough. But it looks clear to me. yes, but that isn't what I meant. Consider the following: 1. WGCC appoints nomcom 2. A WG chair throws hat into RIPE Chair ring 3. Nomcom, appointed by WGCC, selects that WG chair as candidate 4. WGCC selects that WG chair as RIPE chair-to-be 5. RIPE Community approves the selection Are you ok with this as an outcome of the process? I'm not. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]