This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Some observations and opinions.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Some observations and opinions.
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Some observations and opinions.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Mon Jul 16 23:19:04 CEST 2018
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 16 Jul 2018, at 21:27, Lars-Johan Liman <liman at netnod.se> wrote: >> >> I worry about the case where excellent common sense selected a perfect >> Chair, who over time (intoxicated by his/her unlimited powers ... ;-) >> turns into a less perfect Chair during his/her tenure? > > It's a reasonable concern. Though it should be simple to resolve if that situation arises: "We don't want you any more. Go now." Have you seen that approach working anywhere...? Maybe: "Upon receiving a request to step down from <N> community members, the NomCom and(/or?) the WGCC decide if the Chair has to step down or not." What is a "community member"? I would probably define this as someone who has attended a RIPE meeting in the last <N> years, or with relevant participation in mailing lists, acknowledged by WG Chairs. Cheers, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Some observations and opinions.
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Some observations and opinions.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]