This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Proposal for a RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Proposal for a RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Proposal for a RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Jul 16 14:30:46 CEST 2018
> On 16 Jul 2018, at 09:05, Mirjam Kuehne <mir at ripe.net> wrote: > > Based on community discussions, including a recent plenary session at > RIPE 76, we've developed a proposal for the RIPE Chair selection > process. We are now seeking comments from you on a number of specific > elements Before commenting on the proposal, some clarifications are needed. Which comment forum prevails? Is it the RIPE List or the RIPE Chair Discuss List or is it some web page thingie? Will comments posted to ripe-chair-discuss at ripe.net (say) get relayed to that web page or not? And vice versa... Also, will it be mandatory to have a RIPE NCC Access account to post comments via that web form thing? If so, it seems very wrong to force a *RIPE NCC Access* account as a compulsory prerequisite for discussing RIPE business.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Proposal for a RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Proposal for a RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]