[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?

Can we all calm down a bit please?

We all know each other and I do assume the best intentions on everyone's
part. I am also quite sure that we are not out to hurt each other or to
have an overly polemic debate. The good thing is that there is a lot of
passion here for the future of RIPE. Let's be positive!

Daniel



On 18.05.17 10:55 , Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> 
>> On 18 May 2017, at 10:51, Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/05/17 07:15, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>>
...
>> I think you've been in close proximity to ICANN folk for far too long.
> 
> Ok, that’s a low shot.
> With that, I think I will withdraw from this discussion. 
> 
> Nurani
> 
>> YOU may not find it helpful but it is in fact a job description and a
>> process. Other people have found it helpful.
>>
>>>
>>> And while I also don’t want something over prescriptive, I do think that unless we do away with the concept of a RIPE chair, we need to define it in a way that people can understand it. 
>>
>> There are many positions that don't have a written job description but
>> are nevertheless well regarded, understood and accepted.
>>
>> Nigel