[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?

On 17/05/17 15:09, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> 
> On 17.05.17 12:35 , Nigel Titley wrote:
>> Could I make a suggestion:
>>
>> 1. RIPE Chair job description: Doing the sort of things that the RIPE
>> Chair should do.
>>
>> 2. RIPE Chair selection process: Selected as needed
>>
>> Both of these definitions seem to have worked fine in the past and have
>> the benefit of not involving legions of amateur lawyers who might be
>> better involved in doing something useful.
> 
> 
> I second this proposal.
> 
> Let me propose a friendly amendment based on both the concerns about
> continuity and the axiom that a sound minimal process has to have three
> elements. [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/aller_guten_Dinge_sind_drei]
> 
> 3. RIPE Chair Continuity: The RIPE Chair may appoint and dismiss a vice
> chair.

An excellent amendment. Thank you

Nigel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20170517/44428447/attachment.sig>