This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection (was: RIPE Chair Job description)
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sun Oct 23 14:07:17 CEST 2016
All - I take side with Shane and Jim here: I cannot see any need to rush this trough. It shall get the time it needs - as I am sure no one intends to stretch this over the next decade. And my reading of Shane's proposal for aiming at RIPE 75 rather than 74 was that it's purely inidicative but not mandatory. Best, -C. On 21.10.2016 14:05, Shane Kerr wrote: > Filiz & all, > > tl;dr I think we need an in-person discussion of the procedure. We need > to have the discussion at RIPE 73, or defer using the procedure > until we have had the discussion. > > More words: > > [...] > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]