This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Nov 16 08:31:12 CET 2016
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 22:49, Carlos Friacas <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote: >> >> Either asking the WG Chair with more time on his/her record on that > role/group to step up as Vice-Chair, or run an election process if two > (or more) WG Chairs wish to become Vice-Chair on the same opportunity, > sounds acceptable to me. > > Please don't talk about "elections" in this specific context. We have > to decide on the *selection* process first. An election is just one of > many possibilities of selecting the candidate(s). Until we have > consensus that election is the way to proceed -- and I hope we never > converge on that option -- it is inappropriate to talk about electing > the RIPE (Vice) Chair. Hi Jim, All, What i stated previously is that running some sort of restricted (s)election would be something that wouldn't shock me. Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]