<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Robert,<br>
<br>
The existence of software probes is great, but instead (or
besides) of providing packages or source code, why not distribute
a prebuild VM as OVF file?<br>
<br>
Advantages:<br>
- The RIPE Atlas team manages the whole OS, like it's doing for
the hardware probes. Thus, updates can be deployed whenever
needed.<br>
- You can even use OpenWRT as VM operatingsystem. This means all
the same premises/conditions as for hardware probes.<br>
- an OVF file is easier to deploy, for the community<br>
- RXTXRPT switch is obsolete<br>
- No more false RXTXRPT data, since the report counts all traffic
of the host, not only the traffic that is generated by the SW
probe application.<br>
<br>
Is there an actual reason, why it was decided to let users manage
the software probe installation?<br>
Please consider to distribute a prebuild VM *additionally* to the
existing ways and see what happens. I'm sure, most new users will
choose a prebuild VM.<br>
<br>
<br>
BR,<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
<br>
On 19.01.23 12:48, Robert Kisteleki wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2f3e22e3-f66c-f6e3-f4c8-c45d8e285ab7@ripe.net"><br>
That is reasonable; the difference is that we are not in control;
the host OS is. Redhat/Fedora/derivatives as well as
Debian/derivatives have an official solution to this via their
package management services and I believe this is the standard way
(surely with exceptions :-) ) of handling these matters. We are in
the process of adopting these.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>