<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=NL link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1>Hi there,<o:p> </o:p>I’ve recently joined the Ripe Atlas project. Unfortunately, my lonely probe only gets me around ~20k credits per day and I’m too eager to start running my experiments!<o:p> </o:p>Anyone willing to share some of their credits? My current purpose is to measure the DNS performance of the top 100 (or more, credits permitting 😉) tld nameservers. Basically what was done here <a href="https://bunnycdn.com/blog/is-your-fancy-new-domain-hurting-your-performance-gtld-benchmark/">https://bunnycdn.com/blog/is-your-fancy-new-domain-hurting-your-performance-gtld-benchmark/</a><o:p> </o:p>But including more tlds and split out by region and by tld nameserver (for example, I’ve noticed that for some tlds there’s a single nameserver bringing performance down for all). I will publish all results on my blog, and happy to credit you if you want.<o:p> </o:p>If you don’t have any credits, I’m also very open to suggestions/pointers/etc! Kind regards, Jorma<o:p> </o:p>PS Ripe account is at jdrmar@gmail.com<o:p> </o:p></div></body></html>