This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] decommission of virtual probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] decommission of virtual probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe with ever changing upstreams/ASs?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Tue Nov 7 09:09:17 CET 2023
Hello, If you resurrect / reinstall / relocate a probe and you expect to have different network conditions in its new life, then it is better to install it as a new one. If however you are just changing the hardware or just need to replace it's key, then it's better to reuse the ID (the host can always re-register the same probe with a different key). Your case of no longer using a VPS is probably the first of these two. Every disconnected probe is automatically labeled as such, and eventually becomes "abandoned". You can signal to the world if a particular probe is not expected to come back at all by "writing it off". We'll add this as a self-service feature in the UI, in the meantime you can just let us know (at atlas at ripe.net) and we'll mark it for you. Cheers, Robert On 2023-11-06 20:53, Simon Brandt via ripe-atlas wrote: > Hello folks, dear Atlas team, > > I would like to discuss the case, where a virtual probe is > decommissioned because the place where you ran it will no longer be > available. For example, a VPS which you have rented somewhere, but > you've decided to cancel that service. > > Does it make sense to create and keep a backup of the virtual probe, so > that you can re-deploy it later (with another AS)? Or is it better to > delete the virtual probe and create a new one? > > Also: is there an official way to decommission a virtual probe permanently? > > I felt like this could be interesting for other people too, so i decided > to discuss this question publicly. > > BR, > Simon > >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] decommission of virtual probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probe with ever changing upstreams/ASs?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]