This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] TLS Certificate probes fail ("handshake failure") against Vercel servers
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] TLS Certificate probes fail ("handshake failure") against Vercel servers
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] TLS Certificate probes fail ("handshake failure") against Vercel servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel Stam
mstam at ripe.net
Wed Jan 25 18:30:59 CET 2023
Hi Daniel, I think this may be because the measurement code doesn’t support TLS 1.3 yet, and vercel.com does. It’s a known issue, we’d like to add TLS 1.3 at some point. You can find the relevant code here: https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/ripe-atlas-probe-measurements/blob/7c03fba082e93b7a1f0f14cc3769bb31e83909e3/eperd/sslgetcert.c#L927 ripe-atlas-probe-measurements/sslgetcert.c at 7c03fba082e93b7a1f0f14cc3769bb31e83909e3 · RIPE-NCC/ripe-atlas-probe-measurements github.com Cheers, Michel > On 25 Jan 2023, at 18:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > Hi RIPE Atlas folks-- > > I noticed today that using the "SSL" probe (gathering X.509 certificates > from a TLS endpoint) appears to fail against servers operated by > Vercel. the failure is a uniform "handshake failure" according to the > web interface. > > I think this might be a bug in the probe's implementation of the client > side of TLS. Where could i find the specific implementation of that > probe type so that i can debug it further? > > Or, if this is a known issue, where can i read up on it in more detail? > > I've demonstrated this by probing Vercel's own servers, since they > appear to be eating their own dogfood. > > You can see this with measurement 49131334: > https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/49131334/#probes > > here is the definition of the query i made: > > { > "definitions": [ > { > "target": "vercel.com", > "af": 4, > "port": 443, > "hostname": "vercel.com", > "description": "SSL measurement to vercel.com", > "resolve_on_probe": true, > "skip_dns_check": false, > "type": "sslcert" > } > ], > "probes": [ > { > "type": "area", > "value": "WW", > "requested": 10 > } > ], > "is_oneoff": true, > } > > > This is pretty odd, since normal TLS clients appear to be able to > connect to them fine. Here's me running a manual handshake debugger > against vercel.com's servers: > > $ gnutls-cli-debug vercel.com > GnuTLS debug client 3.7.8 > Checking vercel.com:443 > whether the server accepts default record size (512 bytes)... yes > whether %ALLOW_SMALL_RECORDS is required... no > whether we need to disable TLS 1.2... no > whether we need to disable TLS 1.1... no > whether we need to disable TLS 1.0... no > whether %NO_EXTENSIONS is required... no > for TLS 1.0 (RFC2246) support... no > for TLS 1.0 (RFC2246) support with TLS 1.0 record version... no > for TLS 1.1 (RFC4346) support... no > fallback from TLS 1.1 to... failed > for TLS 1.2 (RFC5246) support... yes > for TLS 1.3 (RFC8446) support... yes > for known TLS or SSL protocols support... yes > TLS1.2 neg fallback from TLS 1.6 to... failed (server requires fallback dance) > for HTTPS server name... Vercel > for certificate chain order... sorted > for safe renegotiation (RFC5746) support... yes > for encrypt-then-MAC (RFC7366) support... no > for ext master secret (RFC7627) support... no > for heartbeat (RFC6520) support... no > for version rollback bug in RSA PMS... yes > whether the server ignores the RSA PMS version... yes > whether small records (512 bytes) are tolerated on handshake... yes > whether cipher suites not in SSL 3.0 spec are accepted... yes > whether a bogus TLS record version in the client hello is accepted... yes > whether the server understands TLS closure alerts... yes > whether the server supports session resumption... yes > for anonymous authentication support... no > for RSA key exchange support... no > |<1>| FFDHE groups advertised, but server didn't support it; falling back to server's choice > for ephemeral Diffie-Hellman support... yes > |<1>| FFDHE groups advertised, but server didn't support it; falling back to server's choice > for RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman support... no > for ephemeral EC Diffie-Hellman support... yes > for VKO GOST-2012 (draft-smyshlyaev-tls12-gost-suites) support... no > for curve SECP256r1 (RFC4492)... yes > for curve SECP384r1 (RFC4492)... yes > for curve SECP521r1 (RFC4492)... yes > for curve X25519 (RFC8422)... yes > for AES-GCM cipher (RFC5288) support... yes > for AES-CCM cipher (RFC6655) support... no > for AES-CCM-8 cipher (RFC6655) support... no > for AES-CBC cipher (RFC3268) support... no > for CAMELLIA-GCM cipher (RFC6367) support... no > for CAMELLIA-CBC cipher (RFC5932) support... no > for 3DES-CBC cipher (RFC2246) support... no > for ARCFOUR 128 cipher (RFC2246) support... no > for CHACHA20-POLY1305 cipher (RFC7905) support... yes > for GOST28147-CNT cipher (draft-smyshlyaev-tls12-gost-suites) support... no > for MD5 MAC support... no > for SHA1 MAC support... no > for SHA256 MAC support... no > for GOST28147-IMIT MAC (draft-smyshlyaev-tls12-gost-suites) support... no > for max record size (RFC6066) support... no > for OCSP status response (RFC6066) support... yes > $ > > Thanks for any pointers, > > --dkg > > -- > ripe-atlas mailing list > ripe-atlas at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20230125/d295764d/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ripe-atlas-probe-measurements.png Type: image/png Size: 100254 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20230125/d295764d/attachment-0001.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] TLS Certificate probes fail ("handshake failure") against Vercel servers
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] TLS Certificate probes fail ("handshake failure") against Vercel servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]