This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Proposal: Remove support for non-public measurements [ONLY-PUBLIC]
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Remove support for non-public measurements [ONLY-PUBLIC]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Petr Špaček
pspacek at isc.org
Mon Jan 2 17:53:58 CET 2023
On 31. 12. 22 14:30, Róbert Kisteleki wrote: > Hello, > > I seem to remember that a typical non-public measurement is a one-off, > and as such the data volume collected and stored is likely to be > relatiely low. > I don't have the numbers readily available to me at this moment, but > we can certainly dig up recent statistics about this. Stats would be interesting. Another thing to consider is that lots of one-off measurements might mean "not much data" and at the same time "inflating database indices a lot" (or not, depending on the schema). Petr Špaček > > Cheers, > Robert > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:42 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: >> >> i asked this quietly before, but let me be more direct. >> >> how much private data is there actually? what percentage of the stored >> data is private? >> >> randy
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Proposal: Remove support for non-public measurements [ONLY-PUBLIC]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]